Now Playing
Loading ...



Listen Live!
Jan 262013
 
Aaron_Swartz_wmc_img
Editorial By Vagabond 'Tony' Carter

Users of the Anonymous meme are at it again it seems, targeting the U.S. Sentencing Commission website in a show of support and outrage over the trial and subsequent suicide of computer scientist and hacktivist Aaron Swartz.

Commission Website1

 

The defacement claims that with Aaron’s death ”a line was crossed.”,  and that they’ve infiltrated several government computer systems and copied secret information that they now threaten to make public. The Department of Justice has yet, as of this writing, to issue a statement (as of this moment the site appears also to be down).

This leads me to wonder a few things, much of which is the same thing that runs through my mind every time someone puts on a virtual anonymous mask and commits a crime of this nature, and yes, this was a criminal act.

Do you honestly think this somehow helps?

While I agree that Aaron’s being charged as a criminal for a violation of a company’s Terms of Service was a travesty of justice and that his death was and is an absolute tragedy. How does actually breaking the law in any way help the cause of an innocent man, whose trial was never completed and who may have even been acquitted had he lived?

As I’ve said many times before: I agree with the sentiment, but not the method. Acts like this do nothing to aide the cause and only drag the names of the true victims, in this case Aaron Swartz, in the mud. A line was crossed alright – by the Anonymous meme user or users responsible for this act of vandalism.

- 30 -

Jan 192013
 
Internet Law

Editorial by Vagabond ‘Tony’ Carter

 

Internet LawWith the suicide of RSS creator, Reddit Co-founder, and internet freedom activist Aaron Swartz making headlines, Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren(D.) has introduced a draft bill to return contract law to its civil home. Her bill which would amend 18 USC § 1030 with what she calls “Aaron’s Law,” and would limit the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and exclude terms of service violations, which are nothing more than a breach of contract.

Lofgren who is a dedicated user of the Reddit social media site, reached out to fellow users on January 15, 2013 to ask for public support of her bill. The proposed amendments however do not take away from the stiff criminal penalties for those who forcibly gain access and under false pretense, or who share/leak data for malicious purposes.

In the case of Aaron Swartz, he had full and legal access to JSTOR files, but used a program to rapidly download a large number of academic articles to his laptop. This may have been a violation of JSTORs EULA/TOS, but that’s all he did. Swartz who had been accused of hacking the JSTOR system by prosecutors, was alleged to have downloaded the files with intent to illegally distribute copyrighted material.

Although no files ever made it out to the public, nor was there proof he intended to do anything more than have a local backup for personal use. Yet under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, (originally written in 1984 and updated over the years)  Swartz was being tried in a criminal case on felony charges, which could have carried a lengthy prison term and massive financial penalties, if convicted.

The stress of this led to his eventual suicide on January 11, 2013.
Continue reading »

Sep 282012
 

Occasionally Krypton Radio makes a fast ninety degree turn and covers something important to everyone, not just science fiction and comic book fans.  In a way this affects the fans too, because it changes the way intellectual property is viewed and used, and that in turn will have an effect on the future of creative work on the Internet.  But here’s the amazing, important thing that just happened, as reported on creativecommons.org:

In California, Governor Jerry Brown has signed two bills (SB 1052 and SB 1053) that will provide for the creation of free, openly licensed digital textbooks for the 50 most popular lower-division college courses offered by California colleges. The legislation was introduced by Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and passed by the California Senate and Assembly in late August.

A crucial component of the California legislation is that the textbooks developed will be made available under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY):

The textbooks and other materials are placed under a creative commons attribution license that allows others to use, distribute, and create derivative works based upon the digital material while still allowing the authors or creators to receive credit for their efforts.

The CC BY license allows teachers to tailor textbook content to students’ needs, permits commercial companies to take the resources and build new products with it (such as video tutorials), and opens the doors for collaboration and improvement of the materials.

Access to affordable textbooks is extremely important for students, as textbook costs continue to rise at four times the rate of inflation, sometimes surpassing the cost of tuition at some community colleges. So, in addition to making the digital textbooks available to students free of cost, the legislation requires that print copies of textbooks will cost about $20.

This is a massive win for California, and a most welcome example of open policy that aims to leverage open licensing to save money for California families and support the needs of teachers and students. You can follow additional news on this initiative and other Open Education Policies at  the  OER registry at CreativeCommons.org.

The ramifications of this are huge – we’ve been stumbling through copyright issues as a society, and the man-handling of copyright law by large corporations has left the small producers and users of intellectual property at a distinct disadvantage.  Copyright used to protect the rights of the original creator long enough for him to be able to sell it in a timely manner, giving him or her enough time to develop the next thing and sell that.  Now copyrights span generations and are bought and sold like commodities, and have a chilling effect on the creation of new ideas, since that new content may violate the copyright of somebody who died fifty years ago.  Instead of stifling creativity, the window of opportunity is now open – the tiniest crack.  But there’s a sliver of daylight coming through that crack, and perhaps new legislation that opens up the locked down intellectual property industry will eventually result, putting copyrights back where they belong – in the hands of the creators.  We can hope.

Congratulations to the California legislature for participating in this ground-breaking new law, and well done, Governor Brown.

- 30 -

Jul 122012
 
Artwork by Catie Donelly, re-published with permission. http://catiemonstro.us/
by Laura Davis 

Artwork by Catie Donelly, re-published with permission. http://catiemonstro.us/

When the threats of violence – including rape and murder – began, Anita Sarkeesian got much more than she bargained for. Sarkeesian, author of the blog Feminist Frequency, recently announced a Kickstarter campaign to raise $6,000 to produce a 5-video series entitled “Tropes vs. Women in Video Games.” The campaign surpassed its initial goal within 24 hours. The threats and derogatory remarks against Sarkeesian and her project that began flooding the Internet, along with the “Beat Up Anita Sarkeesian” online game posted by a detractor, brought so much attention to the project that its Kickstarter campaign exploded to include 6,967 backers who contributed nearly $160,000.

I asked Dr. Jeff Gardere, clinical psychologist and chief contributor for Healthguru.com, about the social dynamics and the psychology behind such deplorable behavior as threatening and creating a video game depicting violence against a complete stranger.

Dr. Gardere says, “Ethically, nothing justifies that kind of mob or bullying action. From a psychological point of view, what happens is that one person may make a negative comment because they may feel emotionally threatened. Though the writer of the comment uses an Internet handle/name/identity, they are in effect anonymous and, therefore, have no psychological filter. They operate strictly from the Id (that part of the mind that is total aggression, sexuality, and primary urges). This then opens a window for other like-minded individuals to give hateful and hurtful comments.

“Now, why would certain people be so threatened by [Ms. Sarkeesian’s] efforts? Could be that these are the individuals who play these violent games (way to much and way too long) in which women, among others, are brutalized. Their threshold has already been lowered when it comes to violence against women and they make an easy transition from the video games to hateful comments towards Anita.”

Sarkeesian was unavailable for interview for this article.  She wrote on Feminist Frequency, “I am truly and sincerely honored by the outpouring of support for this project.  It gives me great hope to see that so many people of all genders are concerned about the way women are represented in gaming.  I’m also deeply moved by the fact that so many of you are standing with me against this staggering tidal wave of hate and harassment.”

Thanks to the over-funding of the project , “Tropes vs. Women in Video Games” will now be produced as a 12-video series, including a classroom curriculum. The series will examine the negative roles in which women are cast in video games, such as: the Damsel in Distress, the Sexy Sidekick, Man with Boobs, Background Decoration, and Mrs. Male Character. One segment will examine positive female characters, and another will investigate the 10 most common defenses of sexism in video games. Each video will be 10-20 minutes in length, and they will be distributed free of charge.

The final score in this mad match-up? Anita: 160,000.  Trolls: 0.

- 30 -

Links

Feb 062012
 
Internet Law
By Samantha Lowell
SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it. ACTA is even worse, and could enable the creation of police states around the world.

Internet activists and civil rights groups worldwide are alarmed at the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), one of the harshest crackdowns on internet piracy, which was signed by 22 nations in 2011 and awaits ratification by the European Union Parliament. Negotiated and signed in secret, ACTA was signed on October 1 2011 by Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and the United States. On January 29, 2012, the European Union and 22 of its member states signed as well, bringing the total number of signatories to 31. If ACTA is ratified by six member states, the convention will become law; however, lack of ratification by the EU would effectively kill the measure.

If ratified, ACTA would criminalize sharing of copyrighted material on an unprecedented scale, and even certain signatories have begun to criticize several provisions of the treaty as being excessively broad in their scope and extreme in enforcement provisions. ACTA, as written, would criminalize such acts as sharing a newspaper article or uploading a video of a party where copyrighted music is played. Violators of any breach would be subject to criminal charges. The ACTA committee would have carte blanche to change its own rules and sanctions with no legal oversight.

Legal scholars and privacy rights advocates object that ACTA would not only allow legal authorities to monitor personal online communications in secrecy and requiring ISPs to closely monitor suspected trademark violators, without court recourse, but that those falsely or erroneously accused would be without legal recourse.

Continue reading »

Jan 202012
 
Internet Law
by Samantha Lowell, Guest Editorialist
SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world

SOPA and PIPA are the victims of industrial hubris and overreach, of arrogant proponents who  didn’t even bother to consider the extremism of their own work, much less that anyone would ever oppose them. Our Congressional representatives are choosing to acknowledge that endorsing these acts in a contentious election year is political suicide, so internet activists can breathe a collective sigh of relief. Yet troubling questions remain.

Why were they supporting these bills in the first place? Most claims by  the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and other proponents of SOPA claimed a loss of revenue and jobs in the entertainment industry, but there was no credible data to back it up. Legislative fact sheets distributed by industry lobbyists such as former Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) cite numbers like $250 billion and 750,000 jobs lost annually to piracy, but nobody seemed to know exactly where these numbers came from. While piracy has of course cost the media industry money, were the losses really as serious as portrayed? As it turns out, the figures SOPA backers such as the MPAA and lobbyists cite come seem to be coming from a variety of biased sources, the most notably damning of which is the highly pro-business lobbying group/think tank, the CATO Institute….and anyone knows never to trust statistics coming from anyone with an axe to grind.

And  if even the MPAA  and others admit openly that eliminating piracy is a technical impossibility, whyo why the sudden push for SOPA and PIPA?  In the wake of second thoughts on SOPA and PIPA by the House and Senate, Congressional watchers and media analysts have begun to point to a less noble motive than protecting Intellectual Property rights: Eliminating competition.

Continue reading »

Sep 272011
 

Krypton Radio Special Report

Krypton Radio Newswire
Not so Anonymous - accused LulzSec hacker Cody Kretzinger, aka "recursion"

Not so Anonymous - accused LulzSec hacker Cody Kretzinger, aka "recursion"

A 23-year-old college student named Cody Kretsinger, allegedly going by the internet handle “recursion” and being the front man for the internet hacking group “LulzSec” was arrested without incident in Arizona last Thursday.  He was charged with conspiracy and the unauthorized impairment of a protected computer, according to a report filed by Reuters – this, in regard to the break-ins of Sony Pictures Entertainment in May and June of 2011.

LulzSec, also known as Lulz Security, claims association with the larger hacker collective known as Anonymous.  The term “lulz” is internet slang for laughter at the expense of someone else’s misery.

The attacks  were accomplished by a common type of attack known as “SQL injection”, which issues normally forbidden commands directly to a website’s underlying database. Most websites are secure from such attacks, and Lulzsec crowed about Sony’s computers shortcomings in a statement at the time that read “From a single injection we accessed EVERYTHING. Why do you put such faith in a company that allows itself to become open to these simple attacks?”

Kretisnger was allegedly one of the persons who  helped post the stolen data from Sony, and was purportedly the “voice” of LulzSec on Twitter.  The stolen data  contained the names and account information on 37,000 users of the Sony Pictures online services.

After appearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lawrence Anderson on Thursday in Phoenix, Kretsinger was ordered released on his own recognizance, but  was prohibited from traveling to any states other than Arizona, California and Illinois and ordered  to use his computer only for schoolwork.  He is scheduled to  appear in Los Angeles federal court Oct. 11 for a post-indictment arraignment.

The penalties for Kretzinger’s involvement with LulzSec could be as much as 15 years in a federal penitentiary.  The FBI continues to follow the broad trail of information connecting the various members of LulzSec and their connection to Anonymous, and the theft and illegal  distribution of other servers’ contents, and even some of their ties to individuals operating within Second Life.  Additional charges may be forthcoming because the indictment notes Kretsinger was aided by other known and unknown co-conspirators. The investigation is ongoing, said FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller. Further arrests seem inevitable.

The LulzSec group claimed to be “hacktivists”, hackers with a political agenda; however, no hacking group that lays claim to this sort of social nobility seems to stay on that path for very long, instead degrading into simple opportunism, or flagrant criminal activity.  Citizens with knowledge of potentially illegal LulzSec or Anonymous activities are encouraged to contact their local FBI office.

- 30 -

Links

 

Jul 252011
 

Krypton Radio Special Report

Krypton Radio Newswire - July 25, 2011
The Wrong Hands Logo

The Wrong Hands Logo.  Second Life Citizens are advised to be aware of where you see this symbol in-world and report its use to the proper authorities. By this we mean Linden Labs, of course.

Tux Winkler, the last member of the notorious Wrong Hands group to retain his original account, was deleted from Second Life  at approximately 9:30 this morning, for egregious violations of  the Second Life Term of Service .  With the loss of their sims Red Square and Revolution, the power of the Wrong Hands over the good people of Second Life is broken.

The Wrong Hands was a group virtually synonymous with that of the now banned Woodbury University group.  The group’s leader pro tem, Tux Winkler, was responsible for a spyware stalking network which targeted peacekeepers, but then broadened its scope to include anyone Tux Winkler didn’t happen to like.

The Wrong Hands group was also responsible for the theft of the Justice League Unlimited’s BrainiacWiki in January of 2010, a move originally touted as whistle-blowing, but their true griefer gang roots were exposed over time.

Activities of Woodbury University, an earlier related group called the Patriotic Nigras, and most recently The Wrong Hands have been strongly supported and sustained by Mark P. McCahill and Peter Ludlow of the Alphaville Herald, presumably to benefit their own academic work studying something they call “Hacktivism”.

The last remaining Wrong Hands base was located in Second Life in the southwest corner of the region known as  Superville.  Built and maintained by Tux Winkler, remained in place for a few hours, but by late afternoon was wiped clean and placed back into the pool of Linden owned property for resale.

On his blog, Winkler claims to have simply shut down his account abruptly and without warning; however, all his known alts are also missing from search, as well as one of the accounts of his wife Tuxette Magic (other of her alts remain untouched). The scripts used in his spyware stalking system have also been blacklisted and cannot be redeployed, effectively killing the system.

The action against Winkler was taken by the Lindens who disassembled some of his devices, verified what they did and how they worked and who Winkler was tracking, and based the ban on their findings.

Winkler is now a fugitive and unwelcome in Second Life.  Merely logging on for him is now a ToS violation.  The public is advised to remain vigilant, and report any sightings of Tux Winkler alternate accounts to the Lindens via abuse reporting.

Update: April 3, 2012

The region Nope in Second Life, established October 22 of 2011 and used exclusively by the fugitive Wrong Hands cybergang, went permanently offline approximately three weeks ago as of this date.  The Wrong Hands group itself appears missing as well.  This indicates a corrective action by Linden Lab.  The online community within Second Life is urged to report Wrong Hands members to Linden Lab admins via abuse reports whenever they are encountered.

It is rumored that Tux Winkler, long time Second Life troll and key figure in The Wrong Hands, has been placed under house arrest in his home in England back in February of 2012 for hacking into, and defacing, various web sites.  While this could not be readily confirmed, Winkler did completely vanish from Second Life so far as anyone has been able to determine, and his web sites and pages on various social media have been altered to cover his tracks, or completely removed.  In the meantime, still obsessed with trying to paint themselves as popular heroes, the Wrong Hands has been busy writing what can only be termed a very creative version of actual events on various third party web sites, whitewashing their break-ins, stalking and theft as being somehow justifiable.

Links