Apr 292012
 
Internet Law

by Krypton Radio Staff Writer Jennifer Sawyer

April 29, 2012 – The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 also known as H.R. 3253 have gained a lot of controversy over the last year and no doubt with good cause. Under section 1104 and subsection (7) the bill is quoted as saying,

“(7) PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION- The Federal Government may, consistent with the need to protect Federal systems and critical information infrastructure from cyber security threats and to mitigate such threats, undertake reasonable efforts to limit the impact on privacy and civil liberties of the sharing of cyber threat information with the Federal Government pursuant to this subsection.  The most recent Amendment to the act passed the House of Representatives on April 26, 2012.

Internet LawThe final tally of votes was 206 Republicans in favor, and 28 opposed. Of the Democrats, 42 were in favor of and 140 were opposed. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and author of CISPA, is quoted as saying, “Stand for America! Support this bill!” and claims the bill would not endanger the privacy of America in any way.  The bill would allow for the ease of sharing information between the U.S government and technology and telecommunications companies such as Intel, Microsoft, and AT&T for the prevention of cyber-attacks to Americans on American soil; so why the great debate? Many people feel that the bill would give the government free reign and authority over the personal information of its citizens. Is the government really looking to be nosey about who we have coffee with or is it an attempt to protect citizens from the scrupulous actions of terrorists and hackers?

The bigger question may in fact be can we as Americans afford not to have an added layer of security over internet privacy? The CISPA act does not say that it will grant authorities the power to use our own personal information against us but rather in the event that terroristic or harmful information present itself it can and will be channeled to the proper security authorities for further investigation without the red tape, legal hassle of previous privacy laws. As Americans we can either choose to chalk it up to another business practice designed to further the strength of America over the information highway or we can choose to continue to chronically complain about someone else’s views in an effort to make ourselves feel better.

Whichever side of the fence you are on, rest assured the internet is here to stay. It is fast and it is changing and above all it is grey. It is through such bills as CISPA that the once blurred facets of the internet can emerge into a black and white path.

You can view the text of the bill in its entirety at thomas.loc.gov.

- 30 -

Mar 182012
 
Internet Law
by Samantha Lowell

Media Moguls At It Again

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

Undeterred by the failure of SOPA and PIPA, media giants have forged an agreement with Comcast, Cablevision, Verizon, Time Warner Cable and other major U.S. Internet service providers (ISPs) to police their own networks in an effort to catch digital pirates and stop illegal file-sharing. Cary Sherman, CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), said most of the participating ISPs should start implementing the program by July 1. This agreement follows the closure of file-sharing giant Megaupload and increased pressure by the MPAA and RIAA to crack down on piracy.

Under the new program, called “graduated response,” customers found to be illegally downloading copyrighted material will first receive one or two notifications from their ISPs, essentially stating that they have been caught. If the illegal downloads continue, subscribers will receive a new notice requesting acknowledgement that the notice has been received. Subsequent offenses can then result in bandwidth throttling and even service suspension

The RIAA and its counterparts,including fellow media giant, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) had managed to forge the deal between major ISPS and the RIAA and the MPAA through in a highly secretive meeting last June–with the apparent support of the White House.

While undoubtedly piracy has cost media giants money, just how much it has cost is increasingly called into question. Figures provided by MPAA/RIAA lobbyists to Congress turn out to have been provided by the highly conservative lobbying group The Cato Institute– which was unable to provide any reliable or exact source or provenance for its figures.

An Uphill Battle

This is merely one more development in a long war between the tech sector in Silicon Valley and the media industry. After the White House and state and federal lawmakers showed support for the industry, leaders at the RIAA and MPAA believed they had the momentum to get antipiracy legislation passed in Congress.

They were wrong of course and the MPAA/RIAA have faced an uphill battle: The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) were run off the rails in Congress, largely by the tech sector. A similar motion, the ACTA treaty, though passed in the EU parliament, now faces an ever-shrinking chance of confirmation as signatory nations begin to have second thoughts-as well as a growing spate of legal challenges.

Continue reading »

Feb 062012
 
Internet Law
By Samantha Lowell
SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it. ACTA is even worse, and could enable the creation of police states around the world.

Internet activists and civil rights groups worldwide are alarmed at the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), one of the harshest crackdowns on internet piracy, which was signed by 22 nations in 2011 and awaits ratification by the European Union Parliament. Negotiated and signed in secret, ACTA was signed on October 1 2011 by Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and the United States. On January 29, 2012, the European Union and 22 of its member states signed as well, bringing the total number of signatories to 31. If ACTA is ratified by six member states, the convention will become law; however, lack of ratification by the EU would effectively kill the measure.

If ratified, ACTA would criminalize sharing of copyrighted material on an unprecedented scale, and even certain signatories have begun to criticize several provisions of the treaty as being excessively broad in their scope and extreme in enforcement provisions. ACTA, as written, would criminalize such acts as sharing a newspaper article or uploading a video of a party where copyrighted music is played. Violators of any breach would be subject to criminal charges. The ACTA committee would have carte blanche to change its own rules and sanctions with no legal oversight.

Legal scholars and privacy rights advocates object that ACTA would not only allow legal authorities to monitor personal online communications in secrecy and requiring ISPs to closely monitor suspected trademark violators, without court recourse, but that those falsely or erroneously accused would be without legal recourse.

Continue reading »

Jan 252012
 
Internet Law
SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

A message for our readers, received from Donny Shaw of fightforthefuture.org:

Now that Congress has had time to process last week’s internet blackout, a consensus has emerged: SOPA and PIPA are toxic for politicians, and going anywhere near them could cost them their re-election.

Freedom is winning.

Together, we’ve done something amazing– never have so many people stood up to defend a free and open internet.  Here’s a San Francisco Chronicle article about how it all came together: The Largest Online Protest in History Started Here.

And here’s Carl Franzen at Talking Points Memo:

“Behind the scenes, Hill staffers from both sides of the aisle confirmed to TPM that the entire piracy debate had become so ‘toxic’ that virtually no lawmakers were likely to be ready to re-engage it anytime soon.”

Experienced Congress-watchers are telling us they’ve never seen anything like this.

Internet users, tech companies, and non-profits joined together to defend fundamental rights on the internet. To a lot of elites in Congress and the corporate world, the internet is just something that lazy teenagers use to spam people with pictures of photoshopped unicorns. The blackout showed that the peer-to-peer internet is about empowerment, and that when we work together we can defeat the corrupt politics of Washington D.C.

The New York Times and Talking Points Memo have both published good articles on how the web blackout was organized.

For months, four senators were the only force blocking passage of PIPA/SOPA. They even promised to filibuster the bill back when most politicians were against them. We need to make sure we support and vote for leaders like them who are willing to going to go out on a limb and oppose SOPA before it was popular to do so. It’s great that we pressured all those other shlubs into opposing web censorship, but these guys deserve the real cred and our support: Click here to donate (scroll down).

What’s next?  The Fight is not over, already new threats to web freedom are starting to emerge (particularly in Europe) and we’re getting ready.  Stay tuned, and for more updates, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you again for standing up for a free and open internet!

- Donny and Fight for the Future

Fight for the Future is a non-profit helping to organize the historic strike against the web censorship bills SOPA and PIPA on our site sopastrike.com – go there for a list of websites that are striking and more information.

Jan 202012
 
Internet Law
by Samantha Lowell, Guest Editorialist
SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world.

SOPA and PIPA could effectively destroy the Internet as it exists today, along with entire economies built on it around the world

SOPA and PIPA are the victims of industrial hubris and overreach, of arrogant proponents who  didn’t even bother to consider the extremism of their own work, much less that anyone would ever oppose them. Our Congressional representatives are choosing to acknowledge that endorsing these acts in a contentious election year is political suicide, so internet activists can breathe a collective sigh of relief. Yet troubling questions remain.

Why were they supporting these bills in the first place? Most claims by  the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and other proponents of SOPA claimed a loss of revenue and jobs in the entertainment industry, but there was no credible data to back it up. Legislative fact sheets distributed by industry lobbyists such as former Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) cite numbers like $250 billion and 750,000 jobs lost annually to piracy, but nobody seemed to know exactly where these numbers came from. While piracy has of course cost the media industry money, were the losses really as serious as portrayed? As it turns out, the figures SOPA backers such as the MPAA and lobbyists cite come seem to be coming from a variety of biased sources, the most notably damning of which is the highly pro-business lobbying group/think tank, the CATO Institute….and anyone knows never to trust statistics coming from anyone with an axe to grind.

And  if even the MPAA  and others admit openly that eliminating piracy is a technical impossibility, whyo why the sudden push for SOPA and PIPA?  In the wake of second thoughts on SOPA and PIPA by the House and Senate, Congressional watchers and media analysts have begun to point to a less noble motive than protecting Intellectual Property rights: Eliminating competition.

Continue reading »

Jan 192012
 
Internet Law

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) Have been Stopped… For Now

An Editorial Update, by Staff Editor PK

A message posted by Wikipedia, following the lifting of their website’s blackout.

Thank you.

The Wikipedia blackout is over — and you have spoken.

More than 162 million people saw our message asking if you could imagine a world without free knowledge. You said no. You shut down Congress’s switchboards. You melted their servers. Your voice was loud and strong. Millions of people have spoken in defense of a free and open Internet.

For us, this is not about money. It’s about knowledge. As a community of authors, editors, photographers, and programmers, we invite everyone to share and build upon our work.

Our mission is to empower and engage people to document the sum of all human knowledge, and to make it available to all humanity, in perpetuity. We care passionately about the rights of authors, because we are authors.

SOPA and PIPA are not dead: they are waiting in the shadows. What’s happened in the last 24 hours, though, is extraordinary. The Internet has enabled creativity, knowledge, and innovation to shine, and as Wikipedia went dark, you’ve directed your energy to protecting it.

We’re turning the lights back on. Help us keep them shining brightly.

January 18th of 2012, truly is a day that will live in Infamy for the history of the internet. It was the day that millions of people from across the United States, and from around the world stood up and told the American government, that they will not tolerate the passing of two bills that had the very real potential to cause harm to the internet, the world’s greatest resource of human knowledge. On January 18th, thousands of websites went dark in protest of the legislation which would give governments and private companies, the ability to shut down websites and tamper with the very inner workings of the internet, in an attempt to stop copyright infringement and electronic piracy of protected content.

Continue reading »